Washington State just put a new law on the books that protects it's citizens from bad faith insurance practices.

Practice Areas

Library

Car Accidents

Doing The Right Thing After The Accident

Cell Phone Bans are Unenforced and Ineffective

Driver Safety is Important for Teens

Billion Dollar Corporation Learns Tough Lesson About Distracted Driving

"Optional" Car Safety

Uninsured Car Accident Claims

Hit By an Uninsured Driver? You Have More Options Than You Think

Insurance Coverage You Need

Pedestrian & Bicycle Accidents

How Pedestrian Accidents Occur

How Most Bicycle Accidents are Caused

Remember the Rules for Pedestrians

WMATA: Who's Driving the Bus?

Motorcycle Accidents

Be Safe and Share the Road With Motorcyclists

Truck Accidents

Sick Truckers Forge Bogus Health Certificates to Stay on the Road

The Common Causes of Truck Accidents (Part One)

Common Causes of Truck Accidents (Part Two)

Trucks are Built for Freight, Not Safety

Insurance Practices, Claims and Coverage Issues

Bigfoot, Flat Earth and Insurance: Eight Popular Insurance Coverage Myths

Customers are Being Overcharged by Insurance

Bad Faith Laid Bare: Allstate Fights to Keep Documents Secret

Will California Become The New Gulf Coast?

Groundbreaking New Law in The Pacific Northwest

Defective Products & Consumer Protection

Big Pharma Gets New Federal Testing Guidelines

RC2: Recall the Right Way

Cheap Foreign Goods May Have Hidden Costs

OxyContin: Pharmaceutical Company Addicts Thousands for Profit

The FDA: Is There a Doctor In The House?

Medical Malpractice

Errors in Surgery

Medical Errors That Should Never Happen

Hospitals and HMO's are Charging for Medical Errors

The Fallacy of "Between You and Your Doctor"

Blood Thinner Overdose Nearly Kills Quaid Twins

Wrongful Death

Secondary Impacts in Sports Can Kill

Plane Crashes, Injuries and Deaths

TWA Flight 800: Ten Years and Nothing has Changed

Personal Injury Documents

Why You Should Choose Lewis & Tompkins to Represent You

Attorney Resources

New Continuance Policy for Prince George's County District Court

Civil Rules of Civil Procedure - D.C. Superior Court

Litigation Forms

D.C. Casefilexpress Filing Instructions

Preparing for a Deposition

D.C. Superior Court Multidoor Dispute Resolution Forms and Instructions

Pattern Discovery

Judge Wetzel's Discovery Checklist for Virginia Trial Attorneys

General

What Will Lewis and Tompkins Do For You? (Part 2 of 2)

What Will Lewis and Tompkins Do For You? (Part 1 of 2)

What Happens During a Lawsuit?

Crane Collapses are a new epidemic

Cars Can Do Everything But Drive Themselves

view all

Groundbreaking New Law in The Pacific Northwest

As personal injury attorneys, we often find ourselves involved in legal action against insurance companies. When that happens, it usually goes like this: Our client gets injured and then files a claim with either their insurance company or the insurance company of the person responsible for the injury. The insurance company sits on the paperwork and doesn’t return phone calls, e-mails or letters, usually for a period of months. When the insurance company finally gets back in touch with the injury victim, it is either to inform them that the injury is not their problem for one reason or another, or they make a settlement offer that is so low that it will only cover some of the costs. This is about the time that our clients contact us.

When an insurance company rejects either a whole claim or most of it for no good reason, this is called “bad faith insurance.” And insurers engage in this sort of activity more than you would think.

A law was recently put into place in the state of Washington that would severely penalize any insurance company that gets caught rejecting a claim for no good reason. SB 5726, known as the Insurance Fair Conduct Act, was introduced to the Washington Senate on January 29th, 2007, and was passed by a wide margin on March 13th. The House passed it with an equally wide margin on April 5th, and the Governor signed it into law on May 15th.

This was when every tort reform organization and insurance company in America went ballistic.

The Insurance Fair Conduct Act makes it very difficult for insurers to do business as usual. If a judge finds that an insurer has denied a claim for no good reason, they will then be forced to pay THREE TIMES what the claim is worth, as well as court costs and attorney fees. Considering that insurers deny claims for no good reason on a pretty regular basis, this new law could cut into the billions of dollars of profits those insurers make every year.

Tort Reform organizations all over the country sent money and lobbyists to Washington, and the end result was the 160,000 signatures needed to place referendum R-67 on the ballot. R-67 would repeal the Insurance Fair Conduct Act, and insurers in Washington could then continue to deny claims just like they used to.

If you are asking yourself how insurers were able to get 160,000 people to support a bill that would hurt the very people offering their support, the answer is pretty simple. There is no one on earth that is more capable of making people hate their own rights as much as insurance companies. The marketing blitz on behalf of the ballot initiative featured the usual villains, with ads featuring mustachioed trial lawyers talking about how this new law will make it that much easier to sue anything that moves or breathes. The R-67 website that went up maintains that the IFCA will cause higher insurance rates, "frivolous lawsuits," overcrowded courts, and mentions all the usual "sky is falling" rhetoric.

It seems unlikely that simply asking insurance companies to live up to their contractually obligated financial obligations to their customers would cause all of these things. And the only people who could cause insurance rates to rise are the insurance companies themselves. The only purpose of this law is to place stiff penalties on those who are found to be breaking the law. If an insurance company has a valid reason to reject a claim, then they have nothing to worry about.

Another argument that is being made is that there is no need for such penalties; that the current legal system works fine on its own.

Michelle Tribble would beg to differ. The Washington resident was in two car accidents and had $18,000 worth of medical bills. Her insurance company rejected her claim, refused to pay even after an independent arbiter ruled in her favor, and finally paid up only after a judge forced them to. This whole process took four years, during which Ms. Tribble’s credit rating was effectively ruined because she had to use her credit cards to pay her medical bills.

What insurers in Washington are worried about is an end to the profit bonanza that they have enjoyed for the past decade or so. And insurers all over the country are taking notice. Hopefully the citizens of Washington will keep this law on the books, which could help put an end to bad faith insurance practices in their state, and could also serve notice to insurers in the rest of the country.

Ask an Attorney

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Lewis & Tompkins
927 15th Street N.W., 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-296-0666

Subscribe to
Our Newsletter

Resources

Car Accidents

view all

Motorcycle Accidents

view all

Truck Accidents

view all

Insurance Practices, Claims and Coverage Issues

view all

Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries

view all

Defective Products & Consumer Protection

view all

Medical Malpractice

view all

Plane Crashes, Injuries and Deaths

view all

Attorney Resources

view all

Maryland Courts

view all

Washington D.C. Courts

view all

Virginia Courts

view all

Attorneys in Other States

view all

Client Resources

view all

General

view all